Nearly 14 million kids aren't getting enough food right now—and that needs to change

Only 15% of kids who qualify for free or reduced lunch at school have actually been getting it.

child food insecurity 2020

One of the most heartbreaking parts of the pandemic, in addition to the lives lost, has been its impact on children.

School closures and remote learning are negatively impacting both kids' educational success and their mental health, but that's not all. Of children who qualify for free or reduced-price school meals, just 15% have actually been getting them, according to U.S. Census Bureau data analyzed by the Brookings Institution.

In June, the Census Bureau asked households that reported having insufficient food how often children under 18 years old "were not eating enough because we just couldn't afford enough food."

"16.5 percent of households with children reported that it was sometimes or often the case that the children were not eating enough due to a lack of resources during the week of June 18-23 2020," the Brookings Institution found. That's 5.5 times the 2018 rate of 3%.


That means child food insecurity has reached record levels, with 13.9 million children not getting enough to eat in June—about 18% of all children in the United States. That's 2.7 times more than the number of children living in a household characterized by child food insecurity at the peak of the Great Recession in 2008, which was 5.1 million, according to Brookings.

Schools across the country have also reported distributing far fewer free or reduced-price meals since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Tucson Unified School District in Arizona served about 35,000 meals a day before the pandemic, NPR reported, but that number has dropped by almost 90%. Lindsay Aguilar, the district's food services director, told NPR it's "disheartening" because 70% of families in the district qualify for free or reduced-price meals.

School districts in Texas are also feeding a fraction of the students they served before the pandemic, according to the Texas Tribune. For example, the Pflugerville Independent School District outside of Austin, told the Tribune it's serving 10,000 students a week compared with 125,000 it served at the same time last year. This even though more families than ever have applied for unemployment and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits in the state.

One Texas mom named Jennifer Gradel told the Tribune that she would have to walk five miles round trip to pick up meals for her three teenagers, which she's considered doing now that they're attending school remotely at home. She receives federal benefits, but the family is short about 30 meals per week by the end of the month since the kids are home for the entire day.

Child food insecurity isn't a new issue—it's just been worsened by the pandemic, when many parents can't get to schools to pick up free or reduced-price meals.

Some school districts have started delivering meals to students' homes by bus, but most are not.

In her analysis of the recent Census Bureau data, Lauren Bauer, a fellow at the Brookings Institution, called for at least a 15% increase in the SNAP maximum benefit "in response to evidence of surging food prices and unprecedented levels of food insecurity among all households and among children." Bauer noted that a 32% increase to the SNAP maximum benefit "would bring benefit levels for a family of four with school age children to be in line with" the USDA's Low-cost food plan.

She also called for Congress to expand two programs it introduced at the start of the pandemic—SNAP Emergency Allotments (EAs) and P-EBT—that would help feed more families and children. "EAs should be reauthorized to explicitly provide EAs to households eligible for the maximum benefit, which would allow 5 million children to benefit from additional resources to purchase food for households that have thus far been excluded from the program," she wrote. "Around 14 million children require immediate nutrition assistance, and there are effective policy levers to pull."

If you want to help children and families dealing with food insecurity in your community, contact your local food bank to see what it needs specifically.

Jo Yurcaba is a writer and editor living in central North Carolina. They cover women's health, LGBTQ+ rights, and politics. When they're not writing, they're usually riding horses or eating lots of southern food.

I felt lost as a new mother, but babywearing helped me find myself again

I wish someone had told me before how special wearing your baby can be, even when you have no idea how to do it.

My first baby and I were alone in our Brooklyn apartment during a particularly cold spring with yet another day of no plans. My husband was back at work after a mere three weeks of parental leave (what a joke!) and all my friends were busy with their childless lives—which kept them too busy to stop by or check in (making me, at times, feel jealous).

It was another day in which I would wait for baby to fall asleep for nap number one so I could shower and get ready to attempt to get out of the house together to do something, anything really, so I wouldn't feel the walls of the apartment close in on me by the time the second nap rolled around. I would pack all the diapers and toys and pacifiers and pump and bottles into a ginormous stroller that was already too heavy to push without a baby in it .

Then I would spend so much time figuring out where we could go with said stroller, because I wanted to avoid places with steps or narrow doors (I couldn't lift the stroller by myself and I was too embarrassed to ask strangers for help—also hi, New Yorkers, please help new moms when you see them huffing and puffing up the subway stairs, okay?). Then I would obsess about the weather, was it too cold to bring the baby out? And by the time I thought I had our adventure planned, the baby would wake up, I would still be in my PJs and it was time to pump yet again.

Slowly, but surely, and mostly thanks to sleep deprivation and isolation, I began to detest this whole new mom life. I've always been a social butterfly. I moved to New York because I craved that non-stop energy the city has and in the years before having my baby I amassed new friends I made through my daily adventures. I would never stop. I would walk everywhere just to take in the scenery and was always on the move.

Now I had this ball and chain attached to me, I thought, that didn't even allow me to make it out of the door to walk the dog. This sucks, I would think regularly, followed by maybe I'm not meant to be a mom after all.

Keep reading Show less

Sorry, you can’t meet our baby yet

Thank you for understanding. ❤️

In just over three weeks, we will become parents. From then on, our hearts will live outside of our bodies. We will finally understand what everyone tells you about bringing a child into the world.

Lately, the range of emotions and hormones has left me feeling nothing short of my new favorite mom word, "hormotional." I'm sure that's normal though, and something most people start to feel as everything suddenly becomes real.

Our bags are mostly packed, diaper bag ready, and birth plan in place. Now it's essentially a waiting game. We're finishing up our online childbirth classes which I must say are quite informational and sometimes entertaining. But in between the waiting and the classes, we've had to think about how we're going to handle life after baby's birth.


I don't mean thinking and planning about the lack of sleep, feeding schedule, or just the overall changes a new baby is going to bring. I'm talking about how we're going to handle excited family members and friends who've waited just as long as we have to meet our child. That sentence sounds so bizarre, right? How we're going to handle family and friends? That sentence shouldn't even have to exist.

Keep reading Show less

Report: President Trump plans to choose Amy Coney Barrett for Supreme Court

What you need to know about this mom of 7.

When Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg died on Friday her spot on the Supreme Court was vacated and on Monday President Trump said he is prepared to make his third U.S. Supreme Court nomination this week. "I will announce it either Friday or Saturday," Trump said on Fox News, adding, "We should wait until the services are over for Justice Ginsburg."

Now, CNN reports President Trump plans to choose Judge Amy Coney Barrett for the Supreme Court Nomination. He is expected to make the announcement on Saturday.

According to CNN, senior Republican sources are "indicating that Barrett is the intended nominee... All sources cautioned that until it is announced by the President, there is always the possibility that Trump makes a last-minute change but the expectation is Barrett is the choice."

President Trump says a vote on this Supreme Court nominee should come before the upcoming presidential election (a move that goes against Ginsberg's last wishes—and the precedent set by the senate in 2016). The President previously said he was looking seriously at five candidates for the spot, but during his Fox News interview on Monday, he only mentioned two: Amy Coney Barrett and Barbara Lagoa.

Here's what you need to know about Amy Coney Barrett

Keep reading Show less