Menu
Democrats and Republicans are both pushing for paid leave in America—and it's about time

We've said it before (and we probably won't stop saying it until we get it): America needs to prioritize paid parental and family leave.

The good news is we're definitely not the only ones saying it. Politicians—both Republicans and Democrats—want to see the United States shed its reputation as the only member country of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) without paid leave.

How that will happen remains to be seen, but there are a few plans floating around, and the one that's been talked about the most in recent days is the Family and Medical Insurance Leave Act, a.k.a the Family Act.

Presidential hopeful Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), along with Connecticut Rep. Rosa L. DeLauro (D) reintroduced the Family Act last month, and this week the U.S. House of Representatives held its first hearing on the act.

It's basically a plan for paid leave insurance (kind of like what Canada has or what Washington state is implementing). Employers and employees (through small payroll deductions) would pay in, and then when a worker has a baby or needs to take time off to care for a family member they'd be able to collect 66% of their wages for 12 weeks.

But even if the Family Act gets through the House, it might have a tough time getting through Congress. Sen. Gillibrand's been bringing this up in every congressional session since 2013, and it's 2019 and we don't have paid leave.

But it's a good time to keep pushing. The general election is coming, and politicians on both sides of the aisle know that the lack of paid leave is a huge pain point for the nation's voters.

In his February State of the Union address, President Trump suggested he wants to make sure "every new parent has the chance to bond with their newborn child," and members of his party have their own ideas about how to make it happen.

Florida Senator Marco Rubio has been working on a plan—the Economic Security for New Parents Act—with Ann Wagner, the U.S. Representative for Missouri's 2nd congressional district, which aims to pay parental leave benefits through Social Security. Workers would basically take from their future Social Security benefits (that they would normally use down the road in retirement) to pay for parental leave for six weeks.

Utah's Sen. Mike Lee of Utah, along with Sen. Joni Ernst of Iowa have also been working on similar legislation tied to Social Security. The idea is quite different from the Family Act, but the existence of both proves that we're moving in the right direction.

A recent poll by the Cato Institute found 88% of Democrats, and 60% of Republicans support paid family leave, (with 72% of Republican women supporting it, versus half of republican men).

Both side of the aisle are ready for paid leave. Let's make it happen.

You might also like:











































he Family and Medical Insurance Leave Act, known as the Family Act,



The Child Care for Working Families Act

https://theconversation.com/why-congress-needs-to-...



3. This isn't just about making sure kids get care, but also they get good teachers

It is no secret that early childcare educators and daycare workers are super underpaid (we're often talking like $10 an hour) compared to those teaching older kids, and so the turnover rate in the industry is unfortunately high.

And who can blame staff for seeking opportunities in other fields when their pay is so low that 4 in 10 American childcare workers rely on public assistance at some point while they are working?

The childcare workers taking care of our families deserve to be paid enough to take care of their own families, and the act would see training and pay increases for these valuable workers, which means less turnover and a better quality of care for our kids.

4. Where would the money come from

The bill itself appropriates $20 billion in fiscal 2020, $30 billion in fiscal 2021, and $40 billion in fiscal 2022, and whatever is needed after that for child care subsidy expansions.



IN EVERY CONGRESS since 2013, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand has introduced a bill that would give workers 12 weeks of partially-paid leave to care for a new baby or a sick relative. Every time, the bill has gone nowhere. This is despite the fact that America is almost the only developed country in the world not to guarantee paid leave to new mothers (many countries also offer it to fathers) and most Americans—Republicans as well as Democrats—would like that to change.

The Family and Medical Insurance Leave Act, known as the Family Act, is unlikely to get very far in the 116th Congress either. The paid leave it proposes would be funded by a small payroll tax paid by employers and employees; Republican lawmakers are unlikely to vote for anything that raises taxes or forces employers to provide benefits.

Why do all of my good parenting or baby-focused inventions come after they've already been invented by someone else? Sigh.

Like the Puj hug hooded baby towel, aka the handiest, softest cotton towel ever created.

Safely removing a wet, slippery baby from the bath can be totally nerve-wracking, and trying to hold onto a towel at the same time without soaking it in the process seems to require an extra arm altogether. It's no wonder so much water ends up on the floor, the countertops, or you(!) after bathing your little one. Their splashing and kicking in the water is beyond adorable, of course, but the clean up after? Not as much.

It sounds simple: Wash your child, sing them a song or two, let them play with some toys, then take them out, place a towel around them, and dry them off. Should be easy, peasy, lemon squeezy, right?

But it hasn't been. It's been more—as one of my favorite memes says—difficult, difficult, lemon difficult. Because until this towel hit the bathtime scene, there was no easy-peasy way to pick up your squirming wet baby without drenching yourself and/or everything around you.

Plus, there is nothing cuter than a baby in a plush hooded towel, right? Well, except when it's paired with a dry, mess-free floor, maybe.

Check out our favorites to make bathtime so much easier:

Keep reading Show less
Shop

For all the sweating and swimming I do in the summer, it seems illogical for my skin to be as parched as ever. But your mid-thirties (and 2020 in general) don't really seem to follow any rule book, so here we are.

A couple of months ago, I was on the lookout for a moisturizer that would not only keep my legs from looking like an ashy mess, but also truly nourish and benefit my skin. I've developed a deep interest in skin care for my face over the past few years and decided it's high time to extend that degree of consideration to the rest of my body. (After all, there's more of it, right?)

It's not that I'm too concerned with aging, but let's be real. If there's something that can be done to slow the Wrinkle Express, I'm going to give it a go. I also wanted to find something natural that wouldn't turn into a goopy mess the second I started sweating.

Enter: Esker's Firming Body Oil.

Keep reading Show less
popular

Our list of 100 baby names that should be on everyone's list this year includes more choices than in the past of names that are obscure and surprising. That's because there are so many more unusual baby names coming into widespread use and baby namers have become a lot more adventurous.

Expectant parents do not need to be told to move beyond Jennifer and Jason. Their thinking about names has evolved to the point that the most useful thing we can do is offer a large menu of intriguing choices.

Here are our picks for the 100 best surprising + unusual baby names now.


Keep reading Show less
Learn + Play